Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant professor, Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Khoy Branch, Khoy, Iran.

2 West Azarbaijan Jihad- Agriculture Orgnization, Headquarters of Urmia Lake Rehabilitation, Urmia, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Flumes are one of the simple tools for measuring flow rate in canals that the flow rate can be calculate only by measuring the flow depth at specific points of control section of them. Blanger (1849) and Bazin (1896) were the first to conduct experimental and theoretical studying on flumes. Since then, many research was done about hydraulic characteristics of different flumes by researchers such as Parshl (1900), Robinson (1968), Samani and Magalanez (1992, 1993), Proginelly and Bonacci (1997), Prabhat (1998), Samani and Magalanez (2000), Bdar and Gare (2014), Davis and Samani (2016) and Mohammadi and Vatankhah (2020). Many of mentioned researchers have done their research on rectangular channels. In this research, possibility of the creating control section by installing a prismatic pier on the central axis of floor in trapezoidal canal and flow measurement in free and submerged flow condition was investigated.


Methodology
To achieve discharge equations, many experiments were performed in free and submerged flow condition in a trapezoidal laboratory canal with length of 6 m, width of 46 cm, height of 70 cm and with adjustable side slope. Four prismatic piers with head angle of 90◦, width of 42, 40, 38 and 36 cm were tested. The height of each pier was considered equal to its width. The experiments were performed on 4 side slopes.
Based on dimensional analysis, the following dimensionless equation was considered as basis of experiments for both free and submerged flow condition.
(1)

where Q is discharge, g is gravity acceleration, y1 is flow depth upstream of prismatic pier and Bc is calculated from the following equation.

(2)

where z is side slope of canal, B is width of canal and b is width of prismatic pier.
On the base of 96 experiment in free flow condition (in a certain side slope, 6 experiment for a pier) and 288 experiment in submerged flow condition (in a certain side slope, 18 experiment for a pier with different submergence ratios) discharge equations for both free and submergence flow condition were obtained separately.

Results and discussion
On the base of performed experiments , variation of dimensionless parameters Q/(gBc5)0.5 versus y1/Bc corresponding to all 4 side slopes is presented in figure 1 and equations 3 and 4 in free and submerged flow condition respectively.
















(a) (b)
Fig. 6- Variation of y1/Bc vs. Q/(gBc5)0.5 for different side slopes, a; free flow b; submerged flow
(3)


(4)


According to equation 3 and 4, exponent of y1 in both equation 3 and 4 is larger than circular, trapezoidal and S-M flumes which are presented by Samani and Magallanes (1992, 1993 and 2000). This makes this flume ideal for water level variations than circular, trapezoidal and S-M flumes. To determine accuracy of the obtained relationships and graphs, statistical parameters, ME, RMSE and MARE, were used. Based on the relationship for all side slopes (equation 3 and 4) MARE is 8.3 and 10.2% for free and submerged flow conditions respectively. The results showed that, using of the flow measurement method in trapezoidal canals is Suitable for free flow conditions and can be used by accepting 12% error for submerged conditions.

Conclusions
The results showed that,
- using of the flow measurement method in trapezoidal canals is ideal for free flow conditions (equation 3).
- The flow measurement method in trapezoidal canals can be used by accepting 12% error for submerged flow conditions (equation 4).
- Compared to circular, trapezoidal and S-M flumes, this flow measurement method has large sensitivity to variation of upstream water level
- It is suggested that, the results of this research be used within the range of studied parameters.

Keywords: Free flow conditions, Irrigation Canals, Prismatic Flumes, Submerged Flow conditions
flow conditions, Irrigation Canals, Prismatic Flumes, Submerged Flow conditions

Keywords

Main Subjects

Badar, A. M. & Ghare, A. D. (2012). Development of discharge prediction model for trapezoidal canals using simple portable flume. International Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 1(5), 37-42.
Badar, A. M. & Ghare, A. D. (2014). Experimental studies on the use of mobile cylinders for measurement of flow through rectangular channels. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 12(4), 504-512.
Bijankhan, M.& Ferro, V. (2019). Experimental study on triangular central baffle flume. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 70, 101641.
Clemmens, A. J., Bos, M. G. & Replogle, J. A. (1993). FLUME, Design and Calibration of Long-Throated Measuring Flumes. International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement Wageningen, 117 pp.
Clemmens, A. J., Wahl. T L, Bos, M. G. & Replogle, J. A. (2001). Water measurement with flumes and weirs. International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Wageningen, 384 pp.
Davis, S. & Samani, Z. (2016). Simple Flow Measurement Devices for Open Channels. New Mexico Water Resources Research Institute. 52 pp.
Ferro, V. (2016). Simple flume with a central baffle. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 52, 53–56.
Ghare, A. D., Kapoor, A. & Badar, A. M. (2020). Cylindrical central baffle flume for flow measurements in open channels. Journal of Irrigation & Drainage Engineering, 146(9),06020007.
Kapoor, A., Ghare, A. D., Vasudeo, A. D. & Badar, A. M. (2019). Channel flow measurement using portable conical central baffle. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 145(11), 06019010.
Lotfi Kolavani F., Bijankhan, M., Di Stefano, C., Ferro, V, & Mahdavi Mazdeh, A. (2018). Flow measurement using circular portable flume. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 62,76-83.
Masoudian, M. & Kordi, E. (2005). Determination of discharge rate in canals by Replogle flume. Journal of Agriculture Science and Natural Resources, 12(2),11-20. (in Persian)
Mohammadi, M. & Vatankhah, A. (2020). Flow measurement flume with cylindrical and conical walls. Iranian soil and water researches, 51(7), 1637-1651. (in Persian)
Peruginelli, A. & Bonacci, F. (1997). Mobile prisms for flow measurement in rectangular channels. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 123(3),170-174.
Prabhata, K. S. (1998). Discussion of “Mobile prisms for flow measurement in rectangular channels” by Peruginelli, A. and Bonacci, F. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 124(5),279-280.
Robinson, A. R. (1968). Trapezoidal flumes for measuring flow in irrigation channels. United states department of agriculture. Agricultural Research Service. 41-140. 15 pp.
Samani, Z. & Magallanez, H. (1992). Hydraulic characteristics of a circular flume. Journal of Irrigation & Drainage Engineering, 117(4),559-567.
Samani, Z. & Magallanez, H. (1993). Measuring water in trapezoidal canals. Journal of Irrigation & Drainage Engineering, 119(4), 181-189.
Samani, Z. & Magallanez, H. (2000). Simple Flume for Flow Measurement in Open Channels. Journal of Irrigation & Drainage Engineering, 126(2), 127-129.
Samani, Z. (2017). Three Simple Flumes for Flow Measurement in Open Channels. Journal of Irrigation & Drainage Engineering, 143(6), 04017010.