Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Agricultural Engineering Research Institute Department, Hamedan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Hamedan, Iran

2 Agricultural Engineering Research Department, East Azarbaijan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Tabriz, Iran

3 Assistant Professor and Professor of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering Department, Agricultural Engineering Research Institute (AERI), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

4 Agricultural Engineering Research Department, Hamadan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Hamadan, Iran.

5 Professor, AERI

Abstract

Studies on the effect of planting pattern on yield and water productivity in potato production have a long history at the international and national levels. It is difficult to draw general conclusions and recommendations for the application of appropriate treatments due to the differences in treatments and research findings. Therefore, the objective of this study was to apply a meta-analysis approach to summarize the results of several investigations on the effect of planting patterns on yield and water productivity in potato production. Consequently, several scientific papers published by the international and national researchers on potato planting patterns were reviewed, screened and analyzed. Control and experimental treatments have been applied in studies on the investigation of the effect of planting pattern on yield and water productivity in potato production. The spacing of potato planting rows in different experiments including 60, 75, 120 and 150 cm has been reported as a single-row and/or two-row under drip and/or sprinkler irrigation systems. The average yield was 33000 kg ha-1 and water productivity was 5.46 kg m-3 in the control treatment with row spacing of 75 cm. Combined results showed that increased yield by changing the planting spacing from the 75 cm to 60 cm 33%, to 120 cm 18% and to 150 cm 8%, respectively. While, the application of planting spacing treatments on water productivity was not statistically significant. Minor positive effects were observed compared to the effect of control treatment. The most positive effect was in the planting spacing of 60 cm (10%). Changes in yield and water productivity in two-row cultivations compared to single row under drip system decreased by 7% , while increased yield and water productivity were 4.6% and 16% under sprinkler system, respectively. Studies on the effect of planting pattern on yield and water productivity in potato production have a long history at the international and national levels. It is difficult to draw general conclusions and recommendations for the application of appropriate treatments due to the differences in treatments and research findings. Therefore, the objective of this study was to apply a meta-analysis approach to summarize the results of several investigations on the effect of planting patterns on yield and water productivity in potato production. Consequently, several scientific papers published by the international and national researchers on potato planting patterns were reviewed, screened and analyzed. Control and experimental treatments have been applied in studies on the investigation of the effect of planting pattern on yield and water productivity in potato production. The spacing of potato planting rows in different experiments including 60, 75, 120 and 150 cm has been reported as a single-row and/or two-row under drip and/or sprinkler irrigation systems. The average yield was 33000 kg ha-1 and water productivity was 5.46 kg m-3 in the control treatment with row spacing of 75 cm. Combined results showed that increased yield by changing the planting spacing from the 75 cm to 60 cm 33%, to 120 cm 18% and to 150 cm 8%, respectively. While, the application of planting spacing treatments on water productivity was not statistically significant. Minor positive effects were observed compared to the effect of control treatment. The most positive effect was in the planting spacing of 60 cm (10%). Changes in yield and water productivity in two-row cultivations compared to single row under drip system decreased by 7% , while increased yield and water productivity were 4.6% and 16% under sprinkler system, respectively. Studies on the effect of planting pattern on yield and water productivity in potato production have a long history at the international and national levels. It is difficult to draw general conclusions and recommendations for the application of appropriate treatments due to the differences in treatments and research findings. Therefore, the objective of this study was to apply a meta-analysis approach to summarize the results of several investigations on the effect of planting patterns on yield and water productivity in potato production. Consequently, several scientific papers published by the international and national researchers on potato planting patterns were reviewed, screened and analyzed. Control and experimental treatments have been applied in studies on the investigation of the effect of planting pattern on yield and water productivity in potato production. The spacing of potato planting rows in different experiments including 60, 75, 120 and 150 cm has been reported as a single-row and/or two-row under drip and/or sprinkler irrigation systems. The average yield was 33000 kg ha-1 and water productivity was 5.46 kg m-3 in the control treatment with row spacing of 75 cm. Combined results showed that increased yield by changing the planting spacing from the 75 cm to 60 cm 33%, to 120 cm 18% and to 150 cm 8%, respectively.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Ahmadi. K. Ebadzadeh. H. R. Hatami. F. Abdshah. H. & Kazemian. A. (2020). Agricultural Statistics of the Crop in Year 2018-2019. Volume I: Crop Products. Ministry of Jahad e Agriculture Deputy of Planning and Economy Information and Communication Technology Center. 97 p. (in Persian)
Asl Ghorghani. R. & Damavandi. A. (2004). The effect of variety and plant density onyield and yield components of potato tuber. Agricultural Sciences. 14(3): 41-50. (in Persian)
Awari. H. W. & Hiwase. S. S. (1994). Effect of irrigation systems on growth and yield of potato. 185-187.
Baghani. J. (2009). Effect of planting pattern and water quantityon Potato Cultivation with Drip Irrigation in Mashhad. Water and Soil, 23(1), doi: 10.22067/jsw.v0i0.1547. (in Persian)
Bahramloo. R. & Nasseri. A. (2009). Optimum irrigation events for potato cultivar Agria. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 11(6): 712-716.
Bahramloo. R. & Nasseri. A. (2010). Effect of deficit irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of potato cultivar Santeh. Iranian Journal of lrrigation and Drainage. 1(4):90-98. (in Persian)
Bahramloo. R. & Seyedan. S. M. (2017). Comparison of Productivity of Production Factors in Fixed Classic Sprinkler and Furrow Irrigation Systems in Potato Fields of Kaboodrahang Plane in Hamedan Province. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 31(4), 559-569. doi: 10.22092/jwra.2018.115717. . (in Persian)
Chen. R., Cheng. W., Cui. J., Liao. J., Fan. H., Zheng. Z. & Ma. F. (2015). Lateral spacing in drip-irrigated wheat: The effects on soil moisture, yield, and water use efficiency. Field Crops Research, 179, 52-62.
FAOSTAT .(2018). Available at: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/ Accessed: November 20, 2021.
Faridi Mayvan. F., Jami Al- Ahmadi. M., Eslami. SV. & Shojaei Noferest. K. (2019). Investigating the effect of different planting patterns on potato growth indices under different levels of irrigation and potassium sulfate fertilizer. Applied Research in Field Crops. 32(2): 1-24. (in Persian)
Ghadami Firouzabadi. A. (2023). Investigation and selection of suitable wheat irrigation system with meta-analysis method. Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage, 17(2), 291-303. (in Persian)
Ghadami Firouzabadi. A. & Seyyedan. M. (2006). Technical and economic evaluation of water consumption in surface irrigation of potatoes in Bahar region. Iranian Agricultural Engineering Research Institute. Research report. 85/1114. (in Persian)
Gurevitch. J. & Hedges. L.V. (1999). Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses. Ecology 80: 1142-1149.
Hedges. L.V. Gurevitch. J. & Curtis. P.S. (1999). The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80: 1150-1156.
Huang. S., Zeng. Y., Wu. J., Shi. Q. & Pan. X. (2013). Effect of crop residue retention on rice yield in China: A meta-analysis. Field crops research 154:188-194.
Izanlo. B. & Habibi. M. (2011). Application of meta-analysis in social and behavioral science: a review of advantages, disadvantages, and methodological issues. RBS 2011; 9 (1)
Karimkhah. M.A., Nasr Esfahani. M. & Mohammadinejad. A. (2014). Studies on interactions of varieties, irrigation regimes and planting types on early blight disease of potato. Research in Plant Pathology. 2(1):1-12. (in Persian)
Kharrou. M. H., Er-Raki. S., Chehbouni. A., Duchemin. B., Simonneaux. V., Le Page. M ... & Jarlan. L. (2011). Water use efficiency and yield of winter wheat under different irrigation regimes in a semi-arid region. Agricultural Sciences in China, 2(03), 273-282.
Molaei. B., Gheysari. M., Mostafazadeh-Fard. B., Landi. E. & Majidi. M. M. (2015). Evaluation of Yield and Yield Characteristics of Two Potato Varieties under Sprinkler and Trickle Irrigation Systems. jwss. 19 (71) :241-251
Moshayyedi. M.,SH., Khaghani. SH., Khaghani. SH., Rahmati. S. & Rajaei. F. (2010). Investigating the effect of planting patterns on yield and yield components of Agria and Lady Rosita potato cultivars in Arak region. Findings of Modern Agriculture. 4: 275-283. (in Persian)
Najafi Mousavi. S. (2011). Investigating the effect of time, irrigation method and planting pattern on yield and yield components of potato cultivars in Jiroft region. New Findings of Agriculture. 4: 413-421. (in Persian)
Rezvani. S. M., Ghadami Firouzabadi. A., Soltani. H. & Jafari. A. M. (2019). Effect of different potato sowing pattern on yield and water productivity under sprinkler and drip irrigation conditions. Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage, 13(5), 1307-1316. (in Persian)
Rosegger. S., Dambroth. M. & Siegert. E. (1977). Results of trickle irrigation in row crops. Bauforschung Volkenrod, 27(2) 242-251
Rosenthal. R. & Dematteo. M.R. (2001). Metaanalysis: recent developments in quantitative methods for literature. Annual Review of Psychology 52: 59-82.
Sabbah. A. & Ghaffari Nejad. SA. (2008). Determination of the best water level as trickle, irrigation and method of tape replacement on potato yield in Jiroft area. Pajouhesh & Sazandegi. 79  (194-199). (in Persian)
Sadrghayen. S.H., Nakhjavani Moghadam. M. M. & Baghani. J. (2010). The effect of planting patterns and different water levels on potato yield in drip irrigation method (tape) in Firouzkouh area. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage. Number 1 (4): 99-108. (in Persian)
Salemi. HR., Soliamanipur. A. & Tavakoli. AR. (2016). Effect of Different Irrigation and Planting Methods on Water Productivity and Health of Commercial Varieties of Potato. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 14(1): 48-58. (in Persian)
Siadat. S.A., Hashemi Dezfuli. S.A., Sadeghzadeh Hemayati. S., ValiZadeh. M., Nurmohammadi. GH. & Fathi GH. (2000). The effect of planting pattern and density on yield and morphological features of three potato cultivars in Ardabil region. Agricultural Sciences. 6: 91-111. (in Persian)
Soleimani Pour. A., Bagheri. A., & Vaseghi. E. (2011). Economic Evaluation of Irrigation Methods on Yield of Potato Varieties in Isfahan Province. Agricultural Economics Research, 3(9), 143-164.
Toraji zadeh. H., Naderi Darbaghshahi. MR., Soleymani A. & Golparvar. AR. (2011). The effect of plant density, planting patterns and application of phosphorus amounts on agronomic characteristics and yield of potato in Faridan region of Isfahan. Findings of Modern Agriculture. 6(1): 17-28. . (in Persian)
Weatherhead. E. K., & Danert. K. (2002). Survey of irrigation of outdoor crops in 2001–England. Cranfield University, Silsoe.