نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• امیر مرادی نژاد ¹
• امیر حمزه حقی آبی ²
• مجتبی صانعی ³
• حجت الله یونسی ⁴

¹ استادیار بخش آبخیزداری مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان مرکزی، اراک، ایران

² استاد گروه سازه های آبی دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران

³ دانشیار پژوهشکده حفاظت خاک و آبخیزداری کشور وابسته به سازمان تحقیقات وآموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، تهران، ایران

⁴ استادیار گروه سازه های آبی دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران

چکیده

آشفتگی یکی از مهم‌ترین مشخصه‌های الگوی جریان در آبگیری است . بررسی انرژی جنبشی آشفتگی جریان در پیش بینی توپوگرافی بستر در نظر گرفته می‌شود. تجمع و ورود رسوبات به دهانه آبگیر یکی از مشکلاتی است که در اکثر آبگیرها به وجود می‌آید. در این تحقیق، از دو سازه دیوار جداکننده در جلوی آبگیر و آبشکن در ساحل مقابل آن استفاده شده است. با استفاده از مدل عددی FLOW3D میدان جریان سه بعدی اطراف آبگیر و انرژی جنبشی آشفتگی ترسیم شد. نتایج مدل عددی با مدل آزمایشگاهی مقایسه شد. نتایج نشان داد با افزودن سازه آبشکن با زاویه 60 درجه و در فاصله b2 از مرکز دهانۀ آبگیر در کانال اصلی، سرعت برآیند در کانال اصلی 5/1 برابر دو حالت بدون آبشکن و با دیوار جداکننده است و ناحیه داخل آبگیر را نیز تحت تأثیر قرار می‌دهد. همچنین مرکز تغییر جهت بردارهای سرعت به طرف آبگیر جابه‌جا شده و در نتیجه در محدوده پشت آبشکن سرعت طولی کاهش و قابلیت رسوب‌گذاری وجود دارد. مقایسه توزیع بیشینه انرژی جنبشی آشفتگی جریان در دو عمق مختلف بیانگر افزایش 50 درصدی بیشینه انرژی جنبشی آشفتگی در لایه بالایی نسبت به لایه پایینی می‌باشد

کلیدواژه‌ها

• آبگیر
• آبشکن
• دیوار جداکننده
• هیدرولیک جریان
• مدل عددی

موضوعات

• مدل های ریاضی و بهینه سازی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation of the effect of sediment control structures on the kinetic energy of turbulent in the intake entrance

نویسندگان [English]

• Amir Moradinejad ¹
• amirhamze haghiabi ²
• mojtaba saneie ³
• Hojjat Allah Yonesi ⁴

¹ Assistant Professor, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Department, Markazi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Arak, Iran

² 3- Associate Professor,Water Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture,lorestan University

³ Assistant Professer, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Institute (SCWMRI),Tehran,Iran . Postal addresses:

⁴ Lorestan university,water Engineering department

چکیده [English]

Introduction : Taking water from rivers is one of the most important topics in hydraulic engineering. One of the problems associated with most intakes is the accumulation of sediments in intake entrances. Failure to control the sediment's entering the intakes results in its transfer into irrigation channels and their establishment that creates many problems due to sediment transport or its settlement in various parts. Due to the development of computing systems as well as unmeasurable complexities of water flow and sediment in laboratory models, using numerical simulations can be very effective and substantial in hydraulic investigation of such flows. Flow passing through the lateral intakes and channel junctions is usually turbulent. Turbulence is one of the most important features of the flow pattern in a bend which influences a lot of processes occurred in rivers including erosion, sediment transport, bed morphology, and shape of natural channels. Investigating the kinetic energy of flow turbulence in open channels due to the maximum shear flow of the bed and the scouring of the floor is very important and can be considered for prediction of bed topography. The accumulation and sedimentation in water intake and reduced intake efficiency is one of the problems that arise in most intakes.
Methodology: Therefore, in the present study, the sediment controlling structure, a skimming wall, was used in front of the intake. Then, the three-dimensional flow in sedimentary bed around the intake entrance was simulated by Flow3D model and results were compared with experimental model. In this research to increase intake efficiency and control the amount of sediment entering the intak, two structural skimming wall in front of the intak and spur dike on the opposite shore it is used. In the research using three-dimensional flow field numerical model FLOW3D around 60 ° lateral intake located on the direct path was solved numerically and counters velocity and turbulence kinetic energy is drawn. The experiments conducted and results were compared with the numerical model. Flow hydraulic and dynamics in front and inside the intake is studied. Velocity vectors inside the intake, in both longitudinal and lateral directions were compared with experimental results.
Results and Discussion: In the absence of structures, inside the main channel, the flow separation width at levels close to the bed is broader than the higher levels. However, by installing skimming wall in front of the intake, the flow separation close to the substrates carrying more sediment is reduced and it is increased on the surface that has less sediment. It also allows less sediment into the intake. In the absence of structures, the surface flow lines in the intake tend to the right wall and the bottom flow lines tend to the left wall. The width of separation zone on the surface is broader than the one on the floor. In presence of skimming wall structure or both skimming wall and spur dike, the flow lines near the bottom tends to the channel center. In addition, the zone with stagnant flow on the left side of intake is broader at the bottom than on the surface.
In all three cases, the maximum longitudinal velocity and the maximum resultant velocity have occurred at the beginning of the intake inlet in its left corner. The maximum transverse velocity has occurred in the intake center. In these figures, there are areas with secondary vortex flow on downstream and the left of the intake.
Conclusions: The results showed that by adding the structure of the spur dike in the main channel, the velocity in the main channel is 1.5 times compared with the other two cases. and the area inside the intake also affects. Also, the tip of the axis of the velocity vectors is displaced to the intake. As a result, In the back area of the spur dike, the longitudinal velocity decreases and there deposition. Comparison of the distribution of the maximum kinetic energy of flow turbulence at two different depths indicates a 50% increase in the maximum kinetic energy of turbulence in the upper layer compared to the lower layer.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• intake
• skimming wall
• spur dike
• flow hydraulic
• numerical model