نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد؛ گروه مهندسی و مدیریت آب دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

2 استاد گروه مهندسی و مدیریت آب دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه مهندسی آبیاری پردیس ابوریحان دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

تجربیات اخیر شبکه‌های آبیاری نشان داده که شیوه‌های مرسوم بهره‌برداری قادر به توزیع مناسب آب در دوره‌های کم‌آبی نبوده‌اند و ارتقا آن ضروری است. مطالعه حاضر با هدف ارزیابی چهار سناریوی مدیریتی برای بهبود توزیع آب در کانال آبیاری درجه دو عقیلی شرقی شبکه آبیاری و زهکشی گتوند استان خوزستان، تحت شرایط کمبود ۲۰ و ۴۰ درصد جریان انجام شد. سناریوی اول، کاهش متناسب دبی همه آبگیر ها است. سناریوی دوم، اولویت در تحویل کامل برخی آبگیر ها و توزیع کمبود آب بین سایر آبگیر ها است. سناریوی سوم، تحویل کامل آب به نیمی از آبگیر ها و کاهش متناسب نیم دیگر آبگیر ها طی 12 ساعت اول، و عکس آن در 12 ساعت دوم است. سناریوی چهارم، تحویل آب موجود به نیمی از آبگیر ها در 12 ساعت اول، و تحویل آب به نیمه دیگر آبگیر ها در 12 ساعت دوم است. شبیه‌سازی‌ هیدرولیک جریان توسط مدل هیدرودینامیکی ICSS انجام شد. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که بکارگیری سناریو ها در بهبود توزیع آب موثر بوده و با استفاده از آنها می‌توان توزیع آب را با عملکرد بالاتری انجام داد. میزان تاثیر چهار سناریو بر روند بهبود توزیع آب در ۲۰ درصد کمبود آب به این صورت است که سناریو یک بیشترین تاثیر را داشته و بعد از آن به ترتیب سناریو های چهار، سه و دو قرار دارند. همچنین، میزان اثر بخشی سناریو ها در شرایط ۴۰ درصد کمبود آب نیز به این صورت است که به ترتیب سناریوهای چهار، سه، دو و یک بیشترین اثر مثبت را داشته-اند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation and improvement of water management of irrigation networks under water scarce condition (Case study: Eastern Aghili secondary canal)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Shirin Ostovari 1
  • Mohammad Javad Monem 2
  • Mehdy Hashemy 3

1 Department of Water Engineering and Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University

2 Professor, Department of Water Engineering and Management, University of Tarbiat Modares, Tehran, Iran.

3 Irrigation Engineering Dept., Aburaihan Campus, University of Tehran

چکیده [English]

Introduction

The experience of irrigation networks in recent years shows that traditional operation methods are not able to implement proper water delivery in water scarce periods and enhancing is unavoidable. In many cases, delivered water does not match water requirement, and it causes decreasing water productivity and farmer’s dissatisfaction. (Sadeghi and Monem, 2014)

Irrigation delivery under these conditions is a complex process. Optimization techniques have limitations in the above situations (Santhi and Pundarikanthan., 1999)

Monem et al. showed that using hydrodynamic model and unsteady flow analysis is a suitable approach to determine appropriate operation, and performance improvement of irrigation networks under harsh circumstances. (Monem, et al., 2005)

In this paper, the main goal is improving the operational distribution management in irrigation networks in water scarce situation. At the first step, the water delivery and distribution status in Eastern Aghili secondary canal is evaluated for full discharge, 20% and 40% water scarce situation (as scenario 0). At the second step, four management scenarios have been defined, and are simulated to manage water scarcity.

Methodology

Aghili Irrigation Network is located in Gotvand irrigation area in Khuzestan. In present study, the East Aghili secondary canal is selected. This canal is a concrete lined canal having trapezoidal cross section with side slope of 1:1, and length of 16.215 km. The bed width of the canal in the first half is 1.5 meters and for the second half is 1 meter. For clear presentation and discussion of the results, the 9 km of the canal which has 13 outlets is simulated.

Simulations are done using ICSS hydrodynamic model. The ICSS model simulates steady flow by solving gradually varied flow equations proposed by Henderson, and unsteady flow by solving St.Venant equations proposed by Sterlekof. It can simulate different structures with the wide range of operations.

Performance indicators proposed by Molden and Gates (1990) are used for evaluation of the scenarios. Delivery efficiency, adequacy, and equity indicators, are calculated and discussed for scenarios.

In this paper four scenarios are defined for three irrigation level of 100%, 80% and 60% of the required discharge for 24 hour delivery period. The scenarios are:

1. The volume of water delivered to all outlets have been decreased proportionally to the shortage of water at the head of canal. The operation of structures are done at the same time. (Scenario 1)

2. The second scenario is defined by a Prioritization based on cultivation pattern. Outlets number 3, 6, 8, 10, 11, are considered to have priority for water delivery. So, these outlets receive full discharge, and water shortage is distributed to other outlets (Scenario 2)

3. In this scenario the outlets are divided into two groups, which in both groups, sum of the required discharge is equal. In the first 12 hours the first group (outlet numbers 1 to 5) receive their full required discharge, and the second group receive decreased discharge proportional to remaining water left in the canal. At the second 12 hours, the water distribution and corresponding operation is done reversely. (Scenario 3)

4. In this scenario, also, the outlets are divided into two groups, which in both groups, sum of the required discharge is equal. In the first 12 hours the first group (outlets number 1 to 5) are closed, and water is delivered to the second group of outlets. At the second 12 hours, the water delivery and corresponding operation is done reversely. (Scenario 4)

Results and Discussion

The result of zero scenario shows that under 20 percent water scarcity, the Adequacy Index is less than 90% for five outlets, and 38% outlets have medium adequacy. The Equity Index is 0.07. For 40 percent water scarcity, 9 outlets (70%) have a medium and poor adequacy, and the equity index is 0.13. This results show that in water scarce situation, not only the adequacy is decreased, but also the equity of water distribution is harmed.

After the use of four defined scenarios, the results indicate acceptable improvement in all scenarios, under both 20 % and 40 % water scarcity. Under 20% water scarcity the first scenario, and for 40% water scarcity, the fourth scenario has the highest performance indices. For 20% scarcity, the priority of the scenarios are, scenario no. 1, 4, 3, and 2. For 40% scarcity the priorities are, scenario no. 4, 3, 2, and 1.

Conclusion

Water shortage without appropriate management actions, will cause poor performance not only from adequacy point of view, but also from equity aspect. According to the results, all proposed management actions, have acceptable effect in water delivery improvement under both 20% and 40% water scarcity with little differences. For selection of the scenarios in addition to hydraulic performance, operational efforts and social acceptance of different scenarios should be considered as well.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Irrigation canals
  • Operational Management
  • Simulation
  • Water distribution
  • Water scarcity
Bhadra, A., Bandyopadhyay, A., Singh, R. & Raghuwanshi, N. S. (2010). An alternative rotational delivery schedule for improved performance of reservoir-based canal irrigation system. The Journal of Water resources management, (24)13, 3679-3700.
Clemmens, A. J. & D. J. Molden. (2007). Water uses and productivity of irrigation systems. Irrigation Science, (25)3, 247-261.
Ebrahimiyan, F., Monem, M. J., & Delavar, M. (2019). Investigating the Impact of Distribution and Delivery Management in Water shortage Conditions on the Water Productivity Index using Hydrodynamic and Crop Production Models. Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage, (13)1, 142-152.
Hashemy Shahdany, S. M., Adib Majd, E., Firoozfar, A. & Maestre, J.M. (2016). Improving Operation of a Main Irrigation Canal Suffering from Inflow Fluctuation within a Centralized Model Predictive Control System: Case Study of Roodasht Canal, Iran. Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, (142)11.
Henderson, F.M., 1966. Open Channel Flow. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, pp. 522.
Kanooni, A. & Monem. M. J. (2017). Optimization of water allocation and planning in irrigation networks. Drainage and Irrigation, (1)10, 12-23. (In Persian)
Khaeeze., S & Hashemy Shahdany, S. M. (2021). Non-structural modification of agricultural water distribution systems in large scale irrigation districts. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 184, 106102.
Khiabani, M. Y., Shahadany, S. H., Maestre, J. M., Stepanian, R., & Mallakpour, I. (2020). Potential assessment of non-automatic and automatic modernization alternatives for the improvement of water distribution supplied by surface-water resources: a case study in Iran. Agricultural Water Management, 230, 105964.
Kim, Hae‐Do., Kim, J.T., Nam, W.H., Kim, S.J., Choi J.Y. & Koh B.S. (2016). Irrigation Canal Network Flow Analysis by a Hydraulic Model. Irrigation and Drainage, (65)1, 57-65.
Litirco, X., Fromion, V., Baume, J., Arranja, C. & Rijo, M. (2005). Experimental Validation of Methodology to control irrigation canals base on Saint-Venant equation. Control Engineering Practice, (13), 1425-1437.
Manz, D. H., & Schaalje, M., (1992), Development and Application of the Irrigation Conveyance System Simulation Model, CEMAGREF -IIMI International Workshop on The Application of Mathematical Modelling for the Improvement of Irrigation Canal Operation, October 26 - 30, Montpellier, FRANCE.
Molden, D. J. & Gates, T. K. (1990). Performance measures for evaluation of irrigation-water-delivery systems. Irrigation and drainage engineering, (116)6, 804-823.
Monem, M. J., Ghodoosi, H. & Emadi, AR. (2007). Quantifying the operation performance of irrigation canals in changing requirement conditions by hydrodynamic model and turbulent flow analysis. Agriculture research, (3)6, 17-29. (In Persian)
Monem, M. J. & Manz, D. H. (1994). Application of simulation techniques for improving the performance of irrigation conveyance systems. I. J. of Water Resources Engineering, 2, 1-22.
Montazer, A. & Pashazade, N. (2012). Evaluating water distribution function in different operational situation in tha west main canal of Dez irrigation network by hydraulic model CANAL MAN. Water and soil, (25)1, 125-139. (In Persian)
Nam, W.H., Hong, E.M. & Choi, J.Y. (2016). Assessment of water delivery efficiency in irrigation canals using performance indicators. Irrigation Science, (34)2, 129-143.
Sadeghi, S. & Monem, M. J. (2015). Comparison of Lopac gates and sliding gates in irrigation canals under ASCE standard test conditions. The First National Congress of Irrigation and Drainage, May 13-14, Ferdowsi University, Mash-had, Iran. (In Persian)
Seyed Hoshiyar. S.M., Pirmoradian, N., Ashrafzadeh, A., & Parvaresh Rizi. A. (2021). Performance Assessment of a Water Delivery Canal to Improve Agricultural Water Distribution. Water Resources Management , 8, 2021.
Shahrokhnia. M. A., & Javan. M. (2005). Performance assessment of Doroodzan irrigation network by steady state hydraulic modeling. Irrigation and drainage systems, 19, 189-206. 
Shahverdi, K. (2016). Development of on-demand operation system in irrigation networks using reinforcement learning method (Case study: Eastern Aghili Canal), Ph. D. Dissertation, Faculty of Agriculture. Department of Water Structure, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian)
Shammout, M.W., Qtaishat, T., Rawabdeh. H. & Shatanawi. M. (2018). Improving Water Use Efficiency under Deficit Irrigation in the Jordan Valley. Sustainability, (10)11,4317.
Shakir, A.S., Khan, N.M. & Qureshi, M.M. (2010). Canal water management: Case study of upper Chenab Canal in Pakistan. Irrigation and Drainage, (59)1, 76-91.
Small, L.E. & Svendsen, M. 1990. A framework for assessing irrigation performance. Irrigation and drainage systems, (4)4, 283-312.
Strelkoff, T., 1969. One-dimensional equations of open-channel flow, Journal of the Hydraulics Division, ASCE, pp. 861-876.
The Canadian Society for Civil Engineering Task Committee on River Models, 1990. Comparative evaluation of river models, Vol. V of the Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the CSCE, May 1990, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, pp. 282-300.