نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار پژوهشی بخش تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی کشاورزی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان خراسان رضوی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، مشهد، ایران

2 استاد پژوهشی بخش آبیاری و زهکشی، موسسه تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی کشاورزی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران

3 استادیار پژوهشی بخش تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی کشاورزی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان خراسان رضوی، سازمان تحقیقات،

چکیده

هدف اصلی از اجرای این پروژه اندازه‌گیری حجم آب کاربردی، عملکرد و بهره‌وری آب گوجه‌فرنگی در استان خراسان رضوی (مناطق تربت جام، چناران و مشهد) بود. عوامل مختلف از قبیل روش آبیاری، مدیریت آبیاری، بافت خاک و کیفیت آب آبیاری، مختصات جغرافیایی ، بافت خاک، هدایت الکتریکی آب آبیاری و عصاره اشباع خاک مزارع تعیین شدند. همچنین میزان دبی هر منبع آبی، میزان تحصیلات، تاریخ کاشت، تاریخ برداشت، طول دوره رشد، رقم گوجه‌فرنگی، عمق آب در هر بار آبیاری، تعداد آبیاری، ضریب آبشویی، حجم آب کاربردی، عملکرد و بهره‌وری آب بدست آمد. نیاز آبی بر اساس آمار و اطلاعات هواشناسی سالهای اخیر محاسبه و با میزان نیاز آبی برآورد شده در سند ملی آب مقایسه شد. بر اساس نتایج این پروژه، میزان آب کاربردی، میزان عملکرد و بهره‌وری آب در منطقه تربت جام به ترتیب 13424 متر مکعب در هکتار، 50 تن در هکتار و 825/3 کیلوگرم بر مترمکعب حاصل شد. در منطقه چناران میزان آب کاربردی، عملکرد و بهره وری آب به ترتیب 10782 متر مکعب در هکتار، 68 تن در هکتار و 266/6 کیلوگرم بر مترمکعب تعیین شد. حجم آب کاربردی، عملکرد و بهره وری آب در منطقه مشهد نیز به ترتیب 12262 متر مکعب در هکتار، 64 تن در هکتار و 410/4 کیلوگرم بر مترمکعب بدست آمد. در کل میانگین آب کاربردی، عملکرد و بهره وری آب در استان خراسان رضوی در مزارع انتخابی گوجه‌فرنگی بترتیب برابر با 12245 مترمکعب در هکتار، 60 تن در هکتار و 096/5 کیلوگرم بر مترمکعب بدست آمد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Determining of the amount of water used, yield and water productivity in tomato fields in Razavi Khorasan province

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Joleini 1
  • Fariborz Abbasi 2
  • mohammad karimi 3

1 Associate Professor, Agricultural Engineering Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Mashhad, Iran.

2 Professor of Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Agricultural Engineering Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization(AREEO), Mashhad, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction

Razavi Khorasan province is one of Khorasan provinces in northeastern Iran, centered on Mashhad. The area of this province is 118854 square kilometers. Due to having high evaporation potential and low rainfall, which is mostly associated with inappropriate distribution, this region is among the dry and semi-arid regions of our country, so that water is considered the most important factor limiting the growth and development of agriculture. Nowadays, the existence of limitations in water resources has made it necessary to create ways to increase water productivity. This is a proof of the importance of careful planning and finding the use of different irrigation methods to increase the water productivity of agricultural and garden crops. By examining the sources, it was found that the amount of water used in the tomato crop varies in different regions and with different irrigation systems. This research aims to measure the volume of applied water, the yield and productivity of tomato juice under the management of farmers in Razavi Khorasan province (Torbetjam, Chenaran and Mashhad cities) and compare the amount of applied water with the water requirement of tomatoes in these three plains (city) with the national document and It was also calculated by Penman-Monteith method with meteorological data.



Methodology

This project was carried out in the field in order to determine the useful water of tomatoes in the fields under the management of farmers during one cropping season (2019). Three cities of Torbat Jam, Chenaran and Mashhad were selected in Razavi Khorasan province, which have the largest area under tomato cultivation. At first, based on the data required by the project, a questionnaire containing necessary information for investigation and logical conclusion was prepared. The required data of the selected farms in each city were either measured or through face-to-face interviews with the farmer or were calculated and completed according to the data of the previous two stages. The measurements were carried out in type of water source, irrigation network and method and water source discharge, total level The field and area under cultivation of tomato crop, variety, planting arrangement, planting date, soil texture, electrical conductivity of irrigation water and soil saturation extract, date of first irrigation, irrigation cycle and different irrigation methods, etc. The Measured Applied water were compared with the net irrigation water requirement estimated by the Penman-Monteith method using the last 10 years meteorological data (2010 to 2019) and also with the national water document values. Crop yield was recorded at the end of the growing season and water productivity was calculated as the ratio of yield to total water (irrigation applied water and effective rainfall).



Results and Discussion

The results showed that the amount of applied water, the amount of tomato yield and the water productivity in Torbat Jam region were 13424 m3/ha, 50629 kg/ha and 3.825 kg/m3, respectively. The amount of applied water, the amount of tomato yield and the water productivity in Chenaran region were determined as 10782 m3/ha, 67700 kg/ha and 6.266 kg/m3, respectively and The amount of applied water, the amount of tomato yield and the water productivity in Mashhad region were determined as 12262 m3/ha, 63686 kg/ha and 4.410 kg/m3, respectively. The average amount of applied water, the amount of tomato yield and the water productivity in above three regions were determined as 12245 m3/ha, 60219 kg/ha and 5.096 kg/m3, respectively. Also, the average volume of irrigation water, yield and productivity of water in the surface irrigation method were 13379 m3/ha, 52682 kg/ha and 4.042 kg/m3respectively, and in the drip irrigation method are 11621 m3/ha 64365 kg/ha and 5.656 kg/m3 was obtained.





Conclusions

In Razavi Khorasan province, underground water sources are facing a reservoir deficit. Therefore, efforts towards better use of extracted water and reducing exploitation of underground water resources are inevitable. In this project, the water given by the farmers for tomato production during one cropping season and without expert intervention in the irrigation management of the farmer was measured in the three plains of Torbat Jam, Chenaran and Mashhad, which had the largest area under tomato cultivation in Razavi Khorasan province. The method of irrigation of the fields was surface and drip irrigation (type). The results showed that the average applied water, yield and water productivity in all investigated tomato fields were 12245 cubic meters per hectare, 60219 kg per hectare and 5.096 kg per cubic meter of water, respectively. The difference between the volume of applied water, performance and water efficiency in two methods of surface and drip irrigation was significant. Under the drip irrigation system, the amount of applied water is 15% less (11,621 cubic meters per hectare versus 13,379), the yield is 22% higher (64,365 kg/hectare versus 52,682) and the water efficiency is about 40% higher (5.676 kg/cubic meter in vs. 4/042) was from the surface irrigation method.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Tomato
  • applied water
  • water productivity
  • Razavi Khorasan province
  1. Abbasi, F., Jolaini, M. Khorramian, M. Dehghanian , E. Moghbli, E. Nowroozi , M. Yousef Gomrokchi , A. Taheri, M. Zare Mehrani , E. Kiani , A. Salamati , N. mousavifazl , S. A. Ghadami Firouzabadi, A. Bayat , P. & Nasseri , A. (2021). The Role of Modern Irrigation Systems on Tomato Applied Irrigation Water Management in Iran, 22(82), 43-64. (In Persian).
  2. Abbasi, F., M. Joleini, M. Khorramian, S.E. Dehghanian, E. Moghbli Dameneh, M. Nowroozi, A. Uossef Gomrokchi, M. Taheri, E. Zare-Mehrani, A. Kiani, N. Salamati, H. Mousavi Fazl, A. Ghadami-FirouzAbadi, P. Bayat and A. Nasseri. 2021. The role of modern irrigation systems on tomato applied irrigation water management in iran. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering Research, 22(82): 43-64. (In Persian).
  3. Abbasi, F., Sohrab, F. & Abbasi, N. (2016). Evaluation of irrigation efficiencies in Iran. Journal
    of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering Research, 17 (67), pp. 113-128. (In Persian).
  4. Ahmadi, K., EbadZadeh, H. R. Hatami, F. AbdShah, H. & Kazemian, A. (2020). Agricultural
    Statistics of 2018-2019. Ministry of Jihad for Agriculture, Deputy for Planning and
    Economy, Information and Communication Technology Office. Volume 1, Crops. 166pp. (In Persian).
  5. Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S. Raes, D. & Smith, M. (1998). Crop Evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Fao, Rome, 300(9), D05109.
  6. Ayers, R.S. & Westcot, D.W. 1994. Water Quality for Agriculture. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper, No. 29. FAO, Rome, Italy.
  7. Baghani, J. & H. Bayat, (1999). Study and comparison of furrow and drip irrigation methods on
    tomato yield and quality. Research Report of the Agricultural Engineering Research
    Institute, No. 131. (In Persian).
  8. Baghani, J. (2007). Production and efficiency of irrigation water consumption in sugar beet,
    potato, tomato and fodder corn crops in drip and surface irrigation methods. Research
    Report of Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, No. 1366/86. (In Persian).
  9. Barrios-Masiasa, F. & Jacksonb, L. (2016). Increasing the effective use of water in processing tomatoes through alternate furrow irrigation without a yield decrease. Agricultural Water Management. 177: 107–117.
  10. Biswas, S. K., Akanda, A. R. Rahman, M. S. Hossain, M. A. (2015). Effect of drip irrigation and mulching on yield, water-use efficiency and economics of tomato. Plant Soil Environ, 61(3): 97–102.
  11. Ewaid, S. H., Abed, S. A & Al-Ansari, N. (2019). Crop water requirements and irrigation schedules for some major crops in southern Iraq. Water, 11(4), 756.
  12. Ghadami Firouzabadi, A., Asadian, G. H. Jafari, A. M. & Bahramlo, R. (2020). Technical and
    economical evaluation of trickle irrigation systems (Tape) in the cucumber and tomato
    Iranian J. Irrigation and Drainage, 14(1): 263-274. (In Persian).
  13. Jolaini, M. (2011). Investigation the effect of different water and plastic mulch levels on yield and
    water use efficiency of tomato in surface and subsurface drip irrigation method. Water
    and Soil
    , 25(5): 1025-1032.
  14. Khorramian, M. (2013). Effect of tape irrigation levels on yield and quality of tomato in north of
    Khouzestan province. Irrigation Sciences and Engineering, 38(2): 161-170. (In Persian).
  15. Raes, D. (2012). Reference manual-ETO calculator, version 3.2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Land and Water Division. Rome, Italy.
  16. Rahman, S. M., Nawata, L. & Sakuratani, E. (1998). Effects of water stress on yield and related morphological characters among tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Cultivars. Thai Journal of Agricultural Science .31:1, 60-78.
  17. Shahrokhnia, M. A., Zare, A. & Estakhr, A. (2010). Determining the amount of water
    consumption, irrigation efficiency and water use efficiency in farms in four cities of Fars
    Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Comprehensive Water
    Resources Management. University of Kerman, 7-2 Bahman, Kerman, Iran. (In Persian).
  18. Shinohara, Y., Akiba, K. Maruo, T. & Ito, T. (1995). Effect of water stress on the fruit yield, quality and physiological condition of tomato plants using gravel culture. ISHS Acta Horticulturae, 396. Hydroponics and Transplant Production :211-218.
  19. Shrivastava, P. K., Parikh, M. M. Sawani, N. G. & Raman, S. (1994). Effect of drip irrigation and mulching on tomato yield. Agricultural Water Management. 25(2): pp. 179-184.
  20. Stein, L., White, K. & Dainello, F. (1995). Drip irrigation amd plastic mulch conserve water while maintaining cantaloupe yield and quality. Texas A & M Agricultural Research & Extension Center at Uvalde.
  21. Zhang, H., Xionga, Y. Huanga, G. Xu, X. & Huanga, Q. (2017). Effects of water stress on processing tomatoes yield, quality andwater use efficiency with plastic mulched drip irrigation in sandy soilof the Hetao Irrigation District.Agricultural Water Management. 179: 205–214.