نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد گروه علوم و مهندسی آب دانشگاه اراک
2 دانشیار گروه علوم و مهندسی آب دانشگاه اراک
چکیده
سرریز کنگره‌ای با افزایش طول تاج، ضریب آبگذری را افزایش می‌دهد و ارتفاع سیل را نسبت به سرریز خطی کاهش خواهد داد. هدف از این پژوهش بررسی سرریزهای کنگره‌ای نیم‌دایره‌ای و مثلثی همسان می‌باشد. بدین‌معنی که سرریز کنگره‌ای مثلثی تک سیکل با سرریز کنگره‌ای نیم‌دایره‌ای تک سیکل و سرریزهای دو سیکل با یکدیگر مقایسه می‌شوند و تعداد سیکل در مقایسه تاثیر نخواهد داشت. همچنین، پارامترL/W ثابت خواهد ماند و بنابراین فقط تغییرات زاویه راس سرریز و زاویه با جداره کانال موثر خواهد بود. آزمایش‌ها در کانالی با عرض 0/8 متر و در دبی 6 تا 70 لیتر بر ثانیه انجام گردید. 10 مدل با ضخامت 4 میلیمتر ساخته شدند که پنج مدل آن سرریز مثلثی و 5 مدل آن سرریز نیم‌دایره‌ای می‌باشند. ارتفاع سرریزها 15 سانتیمتر و طول سرریزها 126 سانتیمتر می‌باشد. مقایسه سرریزکنگره‌ای مثلثی با نیم‌دایره‌ای همسان، نشان داد که ضریب دبی سرریزهای کنگره‌ای مثلثی تا حدودی بالاتر می‌باشد. با افزایش تعداد سیکل، تداخل تیغه‌های ریزشی و استغراق موضعی افزایش یافته و ضریب دبی کاهش می‌یابد. زاویه راس سرریز کنگره‌ای نیم‌دایره‌ای رو به پایین (180 درجه) بیشتر از زاویه راس سرریزکنگره‌ای مثلثی (35/5 درجه) است که سبب برخورد جت‌های جریان در سرریز کنگره‌ای نیم‌دایره‌ای با زاویه بزرگتری شده و باعث ایجاد آشفتگی و کاهش راندمان بیشتر می‌شود. با قرارگیری راس سرریزکنگره‌ای به سمت بالادست، برخورد جت‌های جریان در راس حذف شده و زاویه سرریز با جدار کانال پایین‌دست نیز افزایش می‌یابد که نهایتا سبب افزایش راندمان سرریز می‌شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Laboratory Investigation of the Performance of Triangular and Semi-circular Homologous Labyrinth Weirs
نویسندگان [English]
- Farehe sadat Arham Namazi 1
- Javad Mozaffari 2
1 MS.c. Student, Water engineering department, Arak University
2 Associate Professor, Water Science & Engineering, Arak University
چکیده [English]
Abstract
Introduction
Labyrinth weirs, compared to linear weirs, reduce the flood height. Labyrinth weirs have a longer length than linear weirs and therefore the flood will pass over it with a lower height. But different forms of Labyrinth weirs have different efficiency. Considering the many effective parameters in the discharge coefficient of Labyrinth weirs, in this research, semi-circular and triangular homologous labyrinth weirs are investigated. Therefore, only changes in the angle of the weir head and the angle with the channel wall will be compared and investigated.
Methodology
Experiments were performed in a channel with a width of 0.8 meters and a flow rate of up to 70 liters per second. Ten weir models with a thickness of 4 mm were made, five of which are triangular weirs and the others are semi-circular weirs. The height of the weirs is 15 cm and the ratio of the length of the weirs to the width of the channel (L/W) is equal to 1.58. Each triangular labyrinth weir was compared with its homologous semi-circular weir. This means that the single-cycle semi-circular Labyrinth weir with the upward apex will be compared with the triangular single-cycle Labyrinth weir with the upward apex. Other Labyrinth weirs will also be compared with their corresponding triangular Labyrinth weirs. This causes the angle of the head of the weir as well as the angle of the weir with the wall of the downstream channel to be investigated and other parameters effective in the discharge coefficient are constant in this investigation. Finally, according to the measured data, a relation for the discharge coefficient will be presented.
Results and Discussion
The comparison of the triangular labyrinth weir with the identical semi-circular weir showed that the discharge coefficient of the triangular weirs is generally higher. The maximum reduction of discharge coefficient for semi-circular labyrinth weir is for single-cycle semi-circular weir and about 9% compared to TL1 triangular labyrinth weir. With the increase of cycles and the placement of the weirs apex towards the upstream, the distance between the discharge coefficient of the identical semi-circular and triangular labyrinth weirs decreases and their efficiency becomes almost the same. The smaller angle of the semi-circular labyrinth weir with downward apex with channel wall causes more interference of Nappe with the channel wall and cause more local submergence and reduce its efficiency. Also, the angle of impact of the flow jets at the apex of the semi-circular labyrinth weir with downward apex is greater than that of the triangular labyrinth weir, which causes more turbulence and as a result reduces the efficiency more at the apex of the semi-circular labyrinth weir. By placing the apex of the labyrinth weir towards the upstream, the impact of the flow jets at the apex is eliminated and the angle of the weir with the wall of the downstream channel increases, which ultimately increases the efficiency of the weir. The increase in efficiency in a semi-circular weir with the apex towards the upstream is more than in a similar triangular weir, and as a result, the discharge coefficient of the two weirs is close to each other. For triangular labyrinth weir, the discharge coefficient is equal to -0.146Ln(HT/P)+0.4959 with a regression of 0.94 and for semicircular labyrinth weir, the discharge coefficient is equal to -0.158Ln(HT /P)+ 0.4731 with a regression of 0.9, which indicates that these relationships fit the data well.
Conclusion
The results showed that the labyrinth weirs with the upward apex have a better performance than the labyrinth weirs with the downward apex. Also, semi-circular labyrinth weirs have lower efficiency than triangular labyrinth weirs. Of course, with the placement of the apex of the labyrinth weirs upstream, the performance of the semi-circular labyrinth weirs increases and they approach the triangular labyrinth weirs. Therefore, in labyrinth weirs with upward apex, which have better performance, the use of each of semi-circular and triangular labyrinth weirs will not make much difference.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Semi-circular labyrinth weir
- Triangular Labyrinth weir
- Nappe Interference
- local submergence
)