نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار بخش تحقیقات فنی مهندسی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان اردبیل (مغان)، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، اردبیل، ایران.

2 استاد بخش تحقیقات زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان اردبیل (مغان)، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، اردبیل، ایران.

3 دانشیار بخش تحقیقات سبزی، صیفی و حبوبات آبی، مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران.

4 محقق بخش تحقیقات زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان اردبیل (مغان)، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، اردبیل، ایران.

10.22092/idser.2026.372199.1642

چکیده

گیاه سیب‌زمینی حساس به تنش کم‌آبی است و در دسترس بودن آب کافی برای افزایش کیفیت و کمیت غدۀ سیب‌زمینی ضروری خواهد بود. هدف از این تحقیق دستیابی به ارقام برتر از نظر صفات زراعی، بازارپسندی، سازگاری با شرایط اقلیمی منطقۀ اردبیل و متحمل­بودن به تنش کم‌آبی و تعیین کارآیی مصرف آب در ارقام سیب‌زمینی در شرایط کم‌آبیاری در منطقه اردبیل است. به‌منظور ارزیابی تعدادی از ارقام برتر سیب‌زمینی، در سال 1403 و 1404 پژوهشی در مزرعه ایستگاه تحقیقات سیب‌زمینی کشور مستقر در شهرستان اردبیل به‌اجرا در آمد. شانزده ژنوتیپ و رقم پرمحصول و با مصارف مختلف (چیپس، خلال، نشاسته، سرخ کردن و تازه‌خوری) در این آزمایش بررسی شدند. آزمایش به‌صورت اسپلیت بلوک بر پایۀ طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار اجرا گردید. کرت افقی شامل سه سطح آبیاری (100 ،80 و 60 درصد آب قابل استفاده) و کرت عمودی شامل 16 ژنوتیپ و رقم سیب‌زمینی بودند. روش آبیاری به‌صورت قطره‌ای (تیپ) و طبق برنامه براساس تیمارهای مورد نظر انتخاب شد. مقدار آب ورودی به هر کرت آزمایشی با کنتور آب اندازه‌گیری گردید. شاخص تحمل به تنش کم­آبی (STi) در ارقام سیب زمینی محاسبه شد. نتایج تجزیۀ واریانس صفات مورد مطالعه نشان داد بین سطوح تنش کم‌آبی، ژنوتیپ‌ها، اثرمتقابل ژنوتیپ‌ها و سال، اثرمتقابل تنش کم‌آبی و ژنوتیپ‌ها و اثرمتقابل سه جانبه تنش کم‌آبی، ژنوتیپ‌ها و سال از لحاظ صفات عملکرد غده، وزن غده در بوته و کارایی مصرف آب و بین سطوح تنش کم‌آبی، ژنوتیپ‌ها و اثرمتقابل تنش کم‌آبی و ژنوتیپ‌ها از لحاظ صفات تعداد غده در بوته، ارتفاع بوته، تعداد ساقۀ اصلی در بوته، درصد مادۀ خشک غده و شاخص سطح برگ اختلاف معنی‌دار مشاهده شد. بیشترین عملکرد غده، وزن غده در بوته و کارایی مصرف آب در شرایط نرمال، تنش ملایم و تنش شدید مربوط به ژنوتیپ‌1043 و ارقام یورواستارچ و جاوید بودند. میزان کاهش عملکرد غده در شرایط تنش ملایم 15 درصد و در شرایط تنش شدید 32 درصد مشاهده شد. ارقام متحمل به تنش کم‌آبی تعداد غده کمتر داشتند اما اندازۀ غدۀ آنها بیشتر بود. درصد ماده خشک غده و کارایی مصرف آب در ارقام متحمل به کم‌آبی در شرایط تنش ملایم و شدید افزایش نشان داد. در زمینۀ تحمل به تنش (STi)، ژنوتیپ­ 1043 و ارقام یورواستارچ و جاوید به عنوان ژنوتیپ­های متحمل به تنش ملایم و شدید انتخاب شدند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Water productivity and of water deficit tolerance evaluation in high-yielding potato cultivars and genotypes in Ardabil region

نویسندگان [English]

  • Karamat Akhavan Geglouَ 1
  • Davoud Hassanpanah 2
  • Ahmad Mousapour Gorji 3
  • Yousef Jahani Jelodar 4

1 Engineering Technical Research Department, Ardabil Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Centre, AREEO, Ardabil, Iran

2 Horticulture Crops Research Department, Ardabil Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Centre, AREEO, Ardabil, Iran

3 Vegetable Crops Research Department,, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, AREEO, Ardabil, Iran

4 Horticulture Crops Research Department, Ardabil Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Centre, AREEO, Ardabil, Iran

چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Introduction
Water deficit is a common stress in potato production that leads to a decrease in tuber quality and yield. Potato plants are sensitive to water deficit stress, and sufficient water availability is essential to increase the quality and quantity of potato tubers, so the aim of this study was to achieve superior cultivars in terms of agronomic traits, marketability, adaptation to regional climatic conditions, and water deficit stress tolerance, and to determine water use efficiency in potato cultivars under low irrigation conditions in Ardabil region.
Methodology
In order to evaluate a number of superior potato cultivars, an experiment was conducted in 2024 and 2025 at the National Potato Research Station farm located in Ardabil. A total of 16 high-yielding genotypes and cultivars with different uses (Chips, French fries, Starch and Fresh consumption) were investigated in this experiment. The experiment was split-block based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. The horizontal plot included three irrigation levels (100, 80, and 60 percent of crop water requirement) and the vertical plot included 16 potato genotypes and cultivars. The tubers were planted in rows with 75 cm spacing and 25 cm plant spacing, and a planting depth of 10 cm. The irrigation method was drip (tape) and according to the schedule based on the desired treatments. The amount of water entering each experimental plot was measured with a water meter. The water deficit stress tolerance index (STi) was calculated in potato cultivars.
Results
The results of the analysis of variance of the studied traits showed that there were significant differences between the levels of water deficit stress, genotypes, the interaction of genotypes and year. Also, the interaction of water deficit stress and genotypes, and the three-way interaction of water deficit stress, genotypes and year in terms of the traits of tuber yield, tuber weight per plant, and water use efficiency, and between the levels of water deficit stress, genotypes were significant. The highest tuber yield, tuber weight per plant, and water use efficiency under normal, mild stress, and severe stress conditions were found in genotypes 1043, Eurostarch, and Javid. The decrease in tuber yield under mild stress conditions was 12 percent and 28 percent under severe stress conditions.
Conclusion
Water deficit stress tolerant cultivars had fewer tubers but larger tuber sizes. Tuber dry matter percentage and water use efficiency increased in water deficit tolerant cultivars under mild and severe stress conditions. Based on the stress tolerance index (STi), G1043 genotype, Eurostar, and Javid cultivars were selected as tolerant genotypes to mild and severe stress. 
Keywords: Potato, Water use efficiency, Water deficit, Quality traits

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Potato
  • Water use efficiency
  • Water deficit
  • Quality traits
Abubaker, B. M. A., Shuang-En, Y., Guang-Cheng, S., Alhadi, M. & Elsiddig, A. (2014). Effect of irrigation levels on the growth, yield and quality of potato. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 20(2), 303-309.
Ahmadi, S. H., Agharezaee, M., Kamgar-Haghighi, A. & Sepaskhah, A. R. (2014). Effects of dynamic and static deficit and partial root zone drying irrigation strategies on yield, tuber sizes distribution and water Productivity of two field grown potato cultivars. Agricultural Water Management, 134, 126-136. doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.11.015.
Aliche, E. B., Theeuwen, T. P., Oortwijn, M., Visser, R. G. & Van der Linden, C. G. (2020). Carbonpartitioning mechanisms in potato underdrought stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 146, 211-21.
Allen, R. G., Pereia, L. S., Raes, D. & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements (FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Al-Mahmud, A., Hossain, A., Al-Mamun, A., Ebna Habib, S. H., Rahaman, S. H., Ali Khan, S. H. & Bazzaz, M. (2014). Plant canopy, tuber yield and growth analysis of potato under moderate and severe drought condition. Journal of Plant Sciences, 25, 201-208.
Anithakumari, A. M. (2011). Genetic dissection of drought tolerance in potato (Ph. D. Thesis), Wageningen University, Netherlands.
Anon. 2025. Ministry of Agricultural Jihad, Deputy for planning and economy, information and communication technology center.
Anonymous. 2024. Bulletin of the Iranian Meteorological Society.
Ayas, S. & Korukcu, A. (2010). Water-yield relationships in deficit irrigated potato. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Uludag University, 24 (2), 23-36.
Baciu, A. (2013). Reaction of native potato varieties to water stress. Journal of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology., 17(2), 80-86.
Badarau, C. L., Marculescu, A. & Chiru, N. (2013). The effects of new treatments on PVY infected potato plants under drought conditions. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Series II: Forestry & Wood Industry & Agricultural Food Engineering, 6(55), 99-104.
Boyd, N. S., Gordon, R. & Martin, R. C. (2002). Relationship between leaf area index and ground cover in potato under different management conditions. Potato Research, 45, 117-129.
Cantore, C., León-Ledesma, M., McAdam, P. & Willman, A. (2014). Breeding potato for quality improvement. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12(1), 108-128.
Coleman, W. K. (2008). Evaluation of wild Solanum spicies for drought resistance Solanum gandarillasii Cardenas. Environmental and Experimental Botany Journal, 62, 221-230.
Debiao, F., Jianying, J., Qiaozhen, L., Huarong, R., Xin, W. & Xingguo, Y. (2012). A determination method of correction coefficient of potato leaf area. Resources Science, 34(8),1533-1537.
Deshi, K. E., Obasi, M. O., Odiaka, N. I., Kalu, B. A. & Ifenkwe, O. P. (2015). Leaf area index values of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) stored for different periods in different kinds of stores. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, 81, 9-19.
Donnelly, D. J. Coleman, W. K. & Coleman, S. E. (2003). Potato micro-tuber production and performance. A Review American Journal of Potato Research. 80, 103-115.
Drapal, M., Farfan-Vignolo, E. R., Gutierrez, O. R., Bonierbale, M., Mihovilovich, E. & Fraser, P. D. (2019). Identification of metabolites associated with water stress responses in Solanum tuberosum L. clones. Phytochemistry, 135, 24-33.
Eskandari, A., Khazaie, H., Nezami, A. & Kafi, M. (2011). Study the effects of irrigation regimes on yield and some qualitative characteristics of three cultivars of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Water and Soil, 25(2), 240-247. doi: 10.22067/jsw.v0i0.9299.
Faridi Myvan, F., Jami Al-Ahmadi, M., Eslami, S. V. & Shojaei Noferest, K. (2018). Studying the effect of planting pattern and potassium fertilizer levels on some physiological characteristics and yield of potatoes (Solanum tubersum L.) under different irrigation levels. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 11(3), 547-560. doi: 10.22077/escs.2018.895.1178
Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Kobayashi, N., Fujita, D. & Basra, S. M. A. (2009). Plant drought stress effect mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29, 185-212.
Frenandez, G. C. J. (1992). Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on adaptation of vegetables and other food crops in temperature and water stress. Taiwan. pp 257-270.
Haghighati, B., Bromand Nasab, S. & Naseri, A. 2016. Effect of irrigation water amount bon yield, some qualitative characteristics and water productivity of two potato cultivars. Crop Physiology Journal, 28(7), 45-60.
Hassanpanah, D. (2009). Effects of water deficit and potassium humate on tuber yield and yield. Iranian Research Journal of Environmental Sciences, 3, 351-356.
Hassanpanah, D., Gurbanov, E., Gadimov, A. & Shahriari, R. (2008). Determination of yield stability in advanced potato cultivars as affected by water deficit and potassium humate in Ardabil region, Iran. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 15, 1354-1359.
Kazemi, M., Banayan Aval, M. & Ghorbani, R. (2016). Quantitative analysis of food security in Khorasan razavi province based on potato production. Applied Field Crops Research, 29(3), 63-75. doi: 10.22092/aj.2016.112699
Lahlou, O., Ouattar, S. & Ledent, J. F. (2003). The effect of drought and cultivar on growth parameters, yield and yield components of potato. Agronomie, 23(3), 257-268.
Mani, F. & Hannachi, C. (2015). Physiology of potato sprouting. Journal of new science, 17(2), 591- 602.
Mastalizadeh, B., khajoei-Nejad, G. & Moradi, R. (2020). Assessing physico-chemical properties of potato as affected by different irrigation methods. Plant Process and Function; 9 (36), 33-48
Mohammadkhani, N. and P. Sharifi. (2016). Anti-oxidative response of different wheat genotypes to drought during anthesis. Iranian Journal of Plant Physiology. 6(4): 1845-1854.
Nasrollahzadeh, A. & Sedaghat, G. (2017). Effects of planting depth and irrigation disruption on yield and yield components in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Crop Science Research in Arid Regions, 1(1), 109-119. doi: 10.22034/csrar.01.01.09
Obidiegwu, J. E., Bryan, G. J., Jones, H. G. & Prashar, A. (2015). Coping with drought stress and adaptive responses in potato, perspectives for improvement. Frontiers in plant science, 6(542), 1-23.
Qin, J., Bian, C., Liu, J., Zhang, J. & Jin, L. (2019). An efficient greenhouse method to screen potato genotypes for drought tolerance. Scientia Horticulturae, 253, 61-69.
Samaee, M., Modarres-Sanavy, S. A. M., Mousapour Gorji, A. & Zand, E. (2017). The study of potato genotypes (Solanum tubersum L.) tolerance to water deficit stress. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 47(4), 527-540. doi: 10.22059/ijfcs.2017.128238.653902
Schittenhelma, S., Sourell, H. & Lopmeierc, F. J. (2006). Drought resistance of potato cultivars with contrasting canopy architecture. European Journal Agronomy, 24, 193-202.
Shock, C. C. & Feibert, E. B. G. (2002). Deficit irrigation of potato. In P. Moutonnet (Ed.) Deficit Irrigation Practices (pp 47-55). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Sobhani, A. R. & Hamidi, H. (2013). Effects of water deficit stress and potassium on yield and water use efficiency of potato by line source sprinkler irrigation. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 6(1), 1-15. doi: 10.22077/escs.2013.133
Vasiter, K. E. (2014). Inheritance of tolerance to drought from selected (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars in Uganda (M.Sc. Thesis), Plant breeding and seed systems of makerere, Uganda.
Villa, P. M., Sarmiento, L., Rada, F. J., Machado, D. & Rodrigues, A. C. (2017). Leaf area index of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) crop under three nitrogen fertilization treatments. Agronomía Colombiana, 35(2), 171-175.